The luxury car tax changes announced by the UK Treasury could significantly impact Australia’s tax system, which currently generates £1.2 billion annually. Initially introduced in 2000 to protect Australian car manufacturing, the tax has become increasingly controversial since domestic production ceased in 2017.
Despite its name, the Australian luxury car tax affects more than high-end vehicles. Consumers pay an additional 33 cents for every dollar above £91,387 for most vehicles or £80,567 for low-emissions cars. However, even practical vehicles like the Toyota LandCruiser and Nissan Patrol can trigger this tax, creating unexpected costs for many buyers. Furthermore, the definition of a fuel-efficient vehicle will tighten significantly from July 2025, changing from 7 litres per 100 kilometres to just 3.5 litres.
UK Treasury Unveils Plan
The UK Treasury has revealed plans to phase out the controversial luxury car tax gradually rather than implementing an immediate abolition. This strategic approach comes as the British government navigates complex negotiations with the European Union on establishing a free-trade agreement that would benefit both parties.
Announcement linked to EU trade negotiations
The Treasury’s decision to tackle the luxury car tax is crucial to broader trade discussions with European partners. Government officials have positioned the tax reform as a bargaining chip in securing improved market access for British goods. Industry reports indicate that European carmakers have been lobbying for this change for at least five years.
Labour transport minister Lilian Greenwood recently signalled the government’s willingness to consider raising the threshold of the expensive car Vehicle Excise Duty (VED) surcharge “for zero-emissions vehicles only, at a future fiscal event.” This adjustment addresses the current Expensive Car Supplement (ECS), which adds £425 annually to vehicles priced above £40,000 from years two to six after purchase.
When combined with the standard annual VED rate of £195, premium vehicle owners face a substantial tax bill of £3,100 in the first six years of ownership. The current threshold particularly affects electric cars, as their average price exceeds £40,000 by approximately £10,000, creating a significant barrier to adoption.
Gradual Removal to Protect Resale Values
Treasury officials have emphasised that any changes to the luxury car tax will be implemented in stages rather than immediately abolished. This measured approach aims to prevent market disruption and protect the resale values of vehicles already purchased under the existing tax regime.
The phased reduction strategy has gained support from key industry stakeholders concerned about potential market instability. The Australian Automotive Dealer Association (AADA) Chief Executive James Voortman endorsed a similar approach in Australia, stating: “We fully support the government’s movements to remove the LCT. Nevertheless, protecting customers who have already purchased a vehicle and their resale value must be considered if this tax is removed”.
Market analysts note that a sudden abolition could rapidly collapse vehicle resale values, creating financial hardship for current owners. Therefore, the Treasury’s gradual implementation plan represents a balanced approach that addresses economic diplomacy needs and consumer protection.
Several automotive manufacturers have welcomed the potential reform. Stellantis UK boss Eurig Druce specifically called for “a review of this new taxation, with a raised threshold, so that UK drivers have fewer barriers in order to make the switch to electric cars”. Ford similarly criticised the government’s decision to impose VED on EVs, arguing it “risks slowing adoption at a crucial time for the industry”.
The Tax Reform Push
European manufacturers have emerged as vocal supporters of the proposed luxury car tax reform, with premium brands standing to gain the most from potential changes. The contentious tax has long been a source of friction between Australian authorities and European automakers seeking more competitive market conditions.
Luxury Brands Hit Hardest by LCT
Under the current tax structure, premium European marques bear the greatest burden. Brands such as Alfa Romeo, Audi, Bentley, BMW, Ferrari, Jaguar, Lamborghini, Mercedes-Benz, and Porsche face additional taxes of 33 cents for every AUD 1.53 over the threshold. This surcharge currently adds thousands to the cost of vehicles that already command premium prices.
European vehicle sales account for approximately 40% (AUD 733.92 million) of Australia’s total AUD 1.83 billion annual luxury car tax revenue. Consequently, these manufacturers have the most to gain from potential reforms and have been amongst the most active voices calling for change.
Declining Sales in Australia Prompt Lobbying
European car manufacturers have intensified their lobbying efforts following declining market performance. Industry bodies have consistently advocated for abolishing the LCT, describing it as a “relic of an era when Australia manufactured vehicles“.
Many European brands not traditionally considered luxury marques—such as Fiat, Peugeot, and Renault—struggle to compete with the influx of affordable vehicles from China. These companies have reportedly told their representatives that any EU free-trade agreement with Australia must include provisions to end the luxury car tax.
Citroën’s Exit Highlights Urgency
The challenges faced by European manufacturers reached a tipping point with Citroën’s departure from the Australian market. This exit is a stark illustration of the pressures confronting European brands attempting to maintain viable operations whilst burdened by additional taxation.
Moreover, European brands seek alternative export markets to recover declining market share, so they view tax reform as increasingly crucial. The Australian government’s willingness to reconsider the tax structure comes amid these mounting pressures and the strategic importance of maintaining positive trade relations with European partners.
Pressure to Replace Lost Tax Revenue
While European manufacturers lobby for change, the Australian government faces a significant financial dilemma regarding potential luxury car tax modifications. Removing this controversial tax would create a substantial revenue gap that needs addressing.
Luxury Car Tax Generates $1.2 Billion Annually
The luxury car tax generates about AUD 1.83 billion in annual revenue for the Aussie government. This substantial sum represents a key funding source that cannot simply vanish from budget calculations. European vehicle sales alone contribute roughly 40% (AUD 733.92 million). The tax applies a 33% surcharge on vehicles exceeding the threshold value—currently AUD 123,186.16 for standard cars and AUD 139,729.83 for fuel-efficient ones.
Budget papers indicate the government expects to receive AUD 2.37 billion this financial year from the combined collection of LCT and import tariffs. Additionally, forecasts show LCT will earn AUD 1.97 billion this financial year before declining to AUD 1.70 billion in 2024-25.
Road User Charges as an Alternative
As discussions about phasing out the luxury car tax progress, road user charges have emerged as the most likely replacement revenue stream. According to industry experts, this approach would involve vehicle owners paying based on distance travelled.
The Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries has advocated for a comprehensive road user charging scheme that remains technology-neutral. Chief Executive Tony Weber suggested this uniform approach could potentially:
- Replace multiple existing charges, including vehicle registration and sales tax
- Address all vehicle users regardless of vehicle type
- Create a more equitable system linked directly to infrastructure use
Public surveys indicate Australians would support such charges if they were transparent and equitable and replaced other road taxes.
Fuel Excise Decline Adds Urgency
The deteriorating fuel excise revenue situation further complicates the government’s tax reform considerations. Australian motorists paid an estimated AUD 24.02 billion in net fuel excise in 2023-24, but this revenue stream faces ongoing erosion.
Fuel excise has declined dramatically compared to Australian government revenue over four decades. This downward trend stems from increasing fuel efficiency—average consumption dropped from 11.3 litres per 100 kilometres in 2005 to around 6.9 litres in 2024. The rising adoption of electric vehicles, which pay no fuel excise, intensifies this challenge.
Treasurer Jim Chalmers has reportedly hinted that addressing falling fuel excise revenue would be a tax reform priority if Labour is re-elected, underscoring the mounting pressure on Australia’s automotive tax framework.
Critics Question Fairness of Tax Removal
Not everyone shares enthusiasm for the proposed luxury car tax changes, with several critics raising concerns about equity. Labour Party officials have questioned whether removing the tax genuinely serves broader public interests or primarily benefits the wealthy.
Benefits to Wealthy Buyers
Former Opposition leader Anthony Albanese articulated the fairness concern directly: “If it’s a choice between someone who is buying a car for a couple of hundred grand and pays a bit of tax or whether that money is available for someone with dementia, I know where my priorities are.” Critics argue that tax relief for premium vehicles diverts funds from essential public services.
The Campaign for Better Transport has likewise raised equity concerns, noting that maintaining road infrastructure requires contributions from all vehicle users. Although 65% of the public believes electric vehicle drivers should pay taxes, they also think these rates should remain lower than those for petrol and diesel drivers.
LCT Impacts Rural and Family Vehicles
Notably, the tax affects more than just premium European marques.
FCAI chief executive Andrew McKellar emphasised: “It would surprise many people to know that Australia’s top-selling ‘luxury’ vehicle is not a Porsche, Ferrari, Rolls Royce or Bentley but in fact it is a Toyota LandCruiser”. For rural families, these vehicles represent necessity rather than luxury. McKellar noted, “The safety of a four-wheel-drive is a necessity in most rural areas, certainly not a luxury”.
Industry Groups Call for Broader Tax Reform
Motoring organisations advocate for comprehensive tax reform beyond simply eliminating LCT. The Association of Fleet Professionals released its Tax and Regulation Manifesto, calling for changes to support electric vehicle adoption. This includes removing plans to introduce VED on electric vans from April 2025 and providing fiscal support to make electric vehicles more attractive in the used market.
Indeed, many industry stakeholders suggest any tax changes should form part of a broader strategy addressing declining fuel excise revenue whilst maintaining incentives for cleaner vehicle adoption.
Conclusion – Luxury Car Tax Changes
Overall, the UK Treasury’s phased approach to luxury car tax reform represents a significant shift in automotive taxation policy. This gradual implementation strategy aims to protect current vehicle owners while addressing European manufacturers’ longstanding concerns. Consequently, premium brands stand to benefit substantially, though critics question whether these changes primarily serve wealthy consumers rather than the broader public interest.
The economic implications remain considerable. Should similar reforms be adopted, Australia would face the challenge of replacing approximately $1.2 billion in annual revenue. Road user charges have emerged as the most likely alternative, potentially creating a more equitable system linked directly to infrastructure use. This approach would address declining fuel excise revenue while establishing a framework that remains technology-neutral across petrol, diesel, and electric vehicles.
Perhaps most significantly, the debate highlights how the definition of “luxury” has evolved dramatically since the tax’s introduction.
The automotive industry awaits further developments with cautious optimism. Though European manufacturers welcome these reforms, they simultaneously recognise that substantial market disruption could occur without careful implementation. Until now, governments have hesitated to eliminate revenue sources without clear alternatives, yet declining fuel excise creates undeniable pressure for comprehensive tax reform.
Regardless of one’s position on luxury car taxation, the current system appears increasingly unsustainable. Whether through gradual phase-out or comprehensive reform, automotive taxation will undoubtedly undergo significant transformation in the coming years as governments balance revenue needs against broader economic and environmental goals.
To learn about Capital Gains Tax on Investment Property, Click Here.
What changes are coming to car tax in the UK from April 2025?
From April 2025, electric cars will be need to pay a standard-rate road tax. New electric vehicles registered after this date will pay £10 for the first year, followed by the standard rate of £195 annually. Additionally, electric cars costing over £40,000 will incur the expensive car supplement from the second to sixth year of ownership.
How will Australia’s luxury car tax threshold change for 2024-25?
For the 2024-25 financial year, Australia’s luxury car tax threshold will be set at AUD 139,729.83 for fuel-efficient vehicles. For all other luxury vehicles, the threshold will be AUD 123,186.16.
What is the most Expensive Car Supplement (ECS) in the UK?
The Expensive Car Supplement (ECS) is an additional charge for vehicles costing over £40,000. It adds £425 annually to the Vehicle Excise Duty (VED) from the second to the sixth year of ownership. From April 2025, this will also apply to electric vehicles.
How might the proposed changes to luxury car tax affect rural and family vehicle owners?
The proposed changes could impact rural and family vehicle owners who rely on larger vehicles like the Toyota LandCruiser. These vehicles, often considered necessities rather than luxuries in rural areas, may currently trigger the luxury car tax threshold. Any reforms would need to consider the practical needs of these consumers.
What alternative revenue sources are being considered to replace the luxury car tax?
Road user charges are being proposed as a potential alternative to the luxury car tax. This system would involve vehicle owners paying based on distance travelled, creating a more equitable system linked directly to infrastructure use. It could potentially replace multiple existing charges and address all vehicle users regardless of vehicle type.